{"id":2013,"date":"2021-04-06T07:49:37","date_gmt":"2021-04-06T07:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gsbagga.com\/?p=2013"},"modified":"2025-11-24T14:23:18","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T14:23:18","slug":"concealment-of-pregnancy-before-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gsbagga.com\/beta\/concealment-of-pregnancy-before-marriage\/","title":{"rendered":"Concealment Of Pregnancy Before Marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"

BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW<\/h2>\n

In a case, wife delivered a child after 203 days of marriage. The child was born after 38 weeks of marriage and wasn\u2019t premature. It was said that wife was pregnant before marriage and it was held that she has committed fraud by concealing the facts from husband who had all the rights to know about this. It was also ascertained that there is no need of calling in aid the presumption under section 112 of Evidence Act.<\/p>\n

SECTION 112 OF EVIDENCE ACT<\/h2>\n

Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872\u00a0 mentions the legitimacy of a child born during wedlock. The law presumes that if a child is \u201cborn during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried\u2026\u201d, it is conclusive proof of its legitimacy unless it can be proven that the parties to the marriage did not have any access to one another.<\/p>\n

It is important\u00a0 to establish laws related to paternity under civil, criminal laws. The law also presumes the legitimacy of a child born during a valid marriage as conclusive. The only exception in such circumstances under the law is non-access between the parties.<\/p>\n

Section 4 of the act lays down the following degrees of presumption<\/p>\n