{"id":1741,"date":"2020-11-07T06:13:35","date_gmt":"2020-11-07T06:13:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gsbagga.com\/?p=1741"},"modified":"2025-11-24T14:23:19","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T14:23:19","slug":"cruelty-in-matrimonial-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gsbagga.com\/beta\/cruelty-in-matrimonial-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Cruelty In Matrimonial Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cruelty in matrimonial cases is considered to be a paramount reason of breakdown of marriages. For Hindus, marriage is considered to be a sacrosanct union of two people that ensures social sanction to physical union between man and woman. Indian legislation focus on safeguarding the institution in order to maintain social balance and harmony. The primary goal of a marriage in India is to foster, self restraint and maintain the bonding of family, with all due regard to the status of the marital status. Speaking of the older era, in the early 90s, divorce wasn\u2019t considered to be a resort since marriage was treated as a pious knot of men and women.<\/p>\n

With time, several legislations were enacted and the marital laws were modified for the betterment of women and the institution that is marriage. The central idea to assure a strong foundation of such relationships among men and women so that they impart the best of their duties and safeguard the piousness of the relationship. The concept of cruelty has not really been defined in the matrimonial laws and legislations. The exact word cruelty has not been defined anywhere in the respective legislations, out of the policy of the legislators.<\/p>\n

Related case facts<\/h2>\n

Speaking of a related case, the house of lords passed a revolutionary judgement on June 27, 1963 that affected the landscape of law. As per the facts of the case, the respondent was an exceptionally lazy man and he was the root cause of conflicts between them. The primary issue between the couple was related to how husband did very little to aid financially and extremely unkind to her. The wife has to pay to the creditors of her husband most of the times. After suffering from this for quite a time, she was reduced to such a physical and mental state where it became very difficult for her to maintain her children and herself. On the very complaint filed by her, the court inserted a non cohabitation clause, after keeping in mind the cruelty and disregard offered by her husband.<\/p>\n

You May Also Interested In Checking Following:<\/h2>\n